Indy IV stuff and thoughts
Apr. 19th, 2008 05:03 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Harrison Ford, in an interview with McPaper a couple of days ago, had this to say about the character who ended his full-time career as a carpenter:
"He gives "no credit to the culture for embracing (Han) as a hero. He's dumb as a stump! He's certainly got a good heart, but I think he's certainly a much less interesting character than Indiana Jones.
"The breadth of his story utility was never extensive. He was the foil between the other more compelling elements of the film. There's not breadth of character to explore beyond what we got out of him."'
For us long-time SW fans, this is nothing new. Ford has expounded on the shallowness of Han Solo for at least 25 years if not longer. I just don't know why he thinks Indy is somehow more complex than Han, except for perhaps the fact that Indy is the main character while Han is not. I realize Han isn't packing a lot of PhDs and he's one of those guys who acts first and thinks about it later, but I don't think he's dumb as a stump either. Moreover, people like him for the following reasons:
1. He holds his own even with characters who have powers and abilities he doesn't have.
2. He has his own ship.
3. His best bud is Chewbacca, and everybody loves Chewbacca.
4. He's not entirely good, but not evil or a heartless son of a bantha like Boba Fett.
5. He is snarky.
Bonus like: Women think he is hot.
I know Josh Holloway (Sawyer on Lost) has said that his character is inspired in part by Han, but while watching ANH, ROTJ, and part of TESB last weekend, it's really obvious that it is the case. I sort of expected Han to call Leia "Freckles." Although she isn't as freckle-y as Kate.
In any case, TFN linked to a thing on that bastion of excellence in journalism, contactmusic.com about Lucas's hopes and dreams for Indy IV:
We're not gonna have adoring fans sending us e-mails saying how much they loved the movie. We're gonna have a bunch of angry people saying, 'You're a bunch of a**holes, you should never have done this. You've ruined my life forever.'"
Don't forget about raped childhoods! From my standpoint, of course there are people who are going to complain no matter what, but I don't foresee a backlash a la post-TPM. There isn't the same crazy buildup to the movie nor is there as many people who have pinned their whole lives on Indy. The worst it'll get is whining over Ford's age or the way Shia LeBeouf's hair is parted.
But it does show how much the overdone hatefest on the part of a vocal minority really got to Papa George. Geez, if it bothered me, I can't imagine how it felt to the guy who created the whole thing, even with the money it made.
Indy stuff has been hitting the stores too. The LEGOs came out a while ago, now I'm finding Dr. Pepper with Indy boxes. Good thing I'm not much of an Indy collector!
"He gives "no credit to the culture for embracing (Han) as a hero. He's dumb as a stump! He's certainly got a good heart, but I think he's certainly a much less interesting character than Indiana Jones.
"The breadth of his story utility was never extensive. He was the foil between the other more compelling elements of the film. There's not breadth of character to explore beyond what we got out of him."'
For us long-time SW fans, this is nothing new. Ford has expounded on the shallowness of Han Solo for at least 25 years if not longer. I just don't know why he thinks Indy is somehow more complex than Han, except for perhaps the fact that Indy is the main character while Han is not. I realize Han isn't packing a lot of PhDs and he's one of those guys who acts first and thinks about it later, but I don't think he's dumb as a stump either. Moreover, people like him for the following reasons:
1. He holds his own even with characters who have powers and abilities he doesn't have.
2. He has his own ship.
3. His best bud is Chewbacca, and everybody loves Chewbacca.
4. He's not entirely good, but not evil or a heartless son of a bantha like Boba Fett.
5. He is snarky.
Bonus like: Women think he is hot.
I know Josh Holloway (Sawyer on Lost) has said that his character is inspired in part by Han, but while watching ANH, ROTJ, and part of TESB last weekend, it's really obvious that it is the case. I sort of expected Han to call Leia "Freckles." Although she isn't as freckle-y as Kate.
In any case, TFN linked to a thing on that bastion of excellence in journalism, contactmusic.com about Lucas's hopes and dreams for Indy IV:
We're not gonna have adoring fans sending us e-mails saying how much they loved the movie. We're gonna have a bunch of angry people saying, 'You're a bunch of a**holes, you should never have done this. You've ruined my life forever.'"
Don't forget about raped childhoods! From my standpoint, of course there are people who are going to complain no matter what, but I don't foresee a backlash a la post-TPM. There isn't the same crazy buildup to the movie nor is there as many people who have pinned their whole lives on Indy. The worst it'll get is whining over Ford's age or the way Shia LeBeouf's hair is parted.
But it does show how much the overdone hatefest on the part of a vocal minority really got to Papa George. Geez, if it bothered me, I can't imagine how it felt to the guy who created the whole thing, even with the money it made.
Indy stuff has been hitting the stores too. The LEGOs came out a while ago, now I'm finding Dr. Pepper with Indy boxes. Good thing I'm not much of an Indy collector!
no subject
Date: 2008-04-20 12:31 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-04-20 05:34 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-04-20 02:20 am (UTC)As for Indy's supposed depth -- what depth? He never changes, he never grows. (Han does both.) He's exactly the same character at the end of "Last Crusade." Speaking of which, "Last Crusade" is a movie in which Indy gets fooled and outwitted by a female Nazi, because he's too busy letting Little Indy do his thinking for him -- even his father is amazed that he could be so stupid.
no subject
Date: 2008-04-20 05:34 am (UTC)You know what really gets me? The media will let a comment like this from an OT actor slide, but the minute someone involved with the PT says something even remotely less than positive about their roles/experiences, everyone jumps all over it as "proof" they despise the PT and George. Just look at the number of times Ewan Mcgregor has been misquoted about his feelings on the PT as a whole. Yeah, he may have had some issues, but he has said over and over again that he didn't regret making them, and was proud to play young Obi-Wan.
Even more recently, some quotes from Hayden have been taken horribly out of context, with articles claiming that he "Slammed the prequels and vowed never to work with George Lucas again". In reality, Hayden said that George was very, very specific about how he wanted him to play Anakin, and in effect, he wasn't given a whole lot of room for his own creative interpretation of the character. "Everything was very predetermined". I do get the feeling that he would have played the character a bit differently if given the choice. But a lot of Hayden's feelings about his performance probably come from all the crap he's gotten (and continues to get) for his role as Anakin. Nevertheless, Hayden has repeatedly said how grateful he was to be part of SW during his Jumper promotion. The media of course ignored all such statements.
no subject
Date: 2008-04-20 05:36 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-04-20 05:35 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-04-20 01:21 pm (UTC)It's funny, before coming in and reading the comments I thought to myself that Harrison sounds a lot like Han Solo when he makes comments like that - the cynicism is so much alike.
Eh, in my "old age" I'm starting to think Harrison's just grumpy because Mark Hamill had a bigger role than he did, and Harrison's turned into a standard Hollywood elitist. :~(
no subject
Date: 2008-04-21 04:03 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-04-23 08:18 am (UTC)And as lp said, HF is and pretty much always has been grumpy. At Celebration 2, when Anthony Daniels interviewed Carrie Fisher, Daniels mentioned what a grouch HF is. She agreed he's a grouch, "but we love him anyway."
Although that last is probably not true for Daniels, who refers to HF as "the movie star," NOT meaning it as a compliment. I don't suppose his encounter with HF at a restaurant a few years ago, where he'd gone over to say hello and HF mistook him for a waiter, did much to endear HF to him either.
no subject
Date: 2008-04-23 11:03 am (UTC)Anyway - yeah, Harrison's definitely a long-time grouch! I went to his alma mater, Ripon College, and he has a reputation among the alumni. Pretty much the ONLY contact he keeps up is with his fraternity, and even that is shaky.
no subject
Date: 2008-04-24 04:24 am (UTC)Given how Harrison is with SW, I'm not at all surprised he's not an enthusiastic alumni of his alma mater.
no subject
Date: 2008-04-20 03:48 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-04-20 01:23 pm (UTC)Hey, maybe this May for the anniversary, we should start a Thank You campaign of fans mailing nice thank you notes to George!
no subject
Date: 2008-04-21 04:04 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-04-21 11:18 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-04-22 04:26 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-04-20 10:50 pm (UTC)I would say Han and Indy are about equally deep, except Han's character undergoes continual growth. The Indy movies are too episodic for any prolonged character development.
no subject
Date: 2008-04-21 04:05 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-04-21 09:17 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-04-22 04:27 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-04-21 01:35 pm (UTC)I don't get it how anyone can dismiss him.
no subject
Date: 2008-04-22 04:28 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-04-23 08:08 am (UTC)In other words, he'd grown and matured enough to have fallen in love for the first time in his life, and to learn to think of people besides himself.
So poo-poo on your anti-Han 'tude, Harry!