![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Let's see, a few days ago we found out that Anthony Daniels will be taking a break from Star Wars In Concert to drop by Celebration; I couldn't imagine the guy missing it.
Then Official Pix jumped the gun by announcing Gary Kurtz as a guest before he formally signed on the dotted line; the announcement was quickly pulled but Philip Wise posted on Rebelscum's forum that for all intents and purposes, Kurtz will be there. Plus he promised a forthcoming announcement on an "oh, cool, he's signing??!" kind of guest. Uh, who could that be?
Kurtz did appear at Celebration IV and he's appeared at cons in Europe for years but I think this is the first time he'll be in the same building as Papa George at like the same time in ages :O. Interesting.
Then Official Pix jumped the gun by announcing Gary Kurtz as a guest before he formally signed on the dotted line; the announcement was quickly pulled but Philip Wise posted on Rebelscum's forum that for all intents and purposes, Kurtz will be there. Plus he promised a forthcoming announcement on an "oh, cool, he's signing??!" kind of guest. Uh, who could that be?
Kurtz did appear at Celebration IV and he's appeared at cons in Europe for years but I think this is the first time he'll be in the same building as Papa George at like the same time in ages :O. Interesting.
no subject
Date: 2010-06-13 02:46 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-06-13 10:44 pm (UTC)At least, that's according to a particularly fetid bedwetter, whose user name was Darth_Insidious if I recall correctly, that was my nemesis back when I could still post on TheForce.net's message board. I asked the jackass how he knew that, and he replied, "From the horse's mouth -- Gary Kurtz himself."
Uh...I would think the horse's mouth, collectively speaking, would belong to the actors: Mark Hamill, Carrie Fisher, and the famously blunt-spoken Harrison Ford, who has NEVER been shy about voicing his opinions of what he considers Lucas's deficiencies as a writer or director. But none of them have ever, in 30-odd years, said or even implied that Kurtz was their "secret" director on the set of ANH. In fact, they scarcely mention him at all. The only time I can remember one of them referring to him was when Carrie Fisher spoke about her famous bralessness in ANH -- a bra would have been visible under her white dress, and Lucas didn't want that. But for running scenes, he ordered that her breasts be bound with gaffer's tape. Quoth Ms. Fisher: "Gary Kurtz had to tell me that. George didn't have the nerve."
Side note -- I can just picture Lucas trying to utter the word "breasts": "Um...we have to tape down her, uh...you know, those uh..." ;-P
no subject
Date: 2010-06-14 07:38 pm (UTC):)
no subject
Date: 2010-06-15 01:19 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-06-15 02:43 am (UTC)His smug arrogance is just astounding.
no subject
Date: 2010-06-16 03:52 am (UTC)I'm no fan of Ms. Portman...but it was patently absurd to see critics rewrite history and glorify Ms. Fisher when, at the time the OT was released, and for some time after, she was dismissed as marginally talented at best, and her performances in the OT were "shrill and nagging." Ms. Fisher was baffled by the 180 degree turnaround: "Now I'm a comedienne. I'm Carole Lombard. Before I was 'bovine' and 'had the worst qualities of both my parents.'" (Meaning, of course, her real-life parents, Eddie Fisher and Debbie Reynolds.) She'd said many times over the years that "a lot of people don't like Leia, they think she's a bitch."
Kurtz needs to a) get over himself; and b) shut his damn pie hole. Smug arrogance -- that's the perfect description of his persona. No wonder he and the loathsome Chris Gore got along so well.
no subject
Date: 2010-06-15 06:07 pm (UTC)What is really sad, that official fansites are actually promoting that piece of crap... :|
no subject
Date: 2010-06-17 07:05 pm (UTC)Are there any unauthorised books on Star Wars that are worth buying?
no subject
Date: 2010-06-18 12:37 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-06-20 09:52 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-06-15 05:33 am (UTC):)
Why thank you. :-)
By the by, one thing Kurtz Kultists, as I call them, don't want you to know is that in an interview given by Kurtz during the time he was SW's producer, he said, and I quote, that it was the duty of the producer to get the director what he wanted. That's a rather strange utterance from a guy we're supposed to think was a "gutsy, tough-talking no-man" as opposed to the "fawning, butt-kissing yes-men" we're supposed to think Lucas surrounds himself with now. And an observer who wrote an article around the same time said, "When Lucas talks, Kurtz listens."
So methinks that Mr. Kurtz, shall we say, misremembers what he actually did back then when he implies/says he was Lucas's "babysitter" who "forced him to care about quality."
Or, in less polite terms, he's a lying, opportunistic, self-serving asshat.
"The Secret History of 'Star Wars'". *snort* Its real (albeit much longer) title should be: "What The Know-It-All Loser Who Wrote This Waste Of Time Wishes Was The Secret History Of 'Star Wars,' So He Could Go On Blaming George Lucas For Destroying His So-Called Life."
no subject
Date: 2010-06-15 06:13 pm (UTC)lying, opportunistic, self-serving asshat.
I might make a Kurtz icon with that text... :)
no subject
Date: 2010-06-16 01:40 am (UTC)According to Kurtz, Lucas chose Richard Marquand to direct ROTJ because he wanted a "lapdog," because he'd been so frustrated with Kersh refusing to do it his way on the set of ESB. First of all, how would Kurtz even know Lucas's reasons for choosing Marquand? He wasn't involved in the process of choosing a director for ROTJ! He'd stopped being Lucas's producer by then! Bedwetters "prove" that he must have been involved with the process of choosing a director by posting photographs Kurtz took on the set of ROTJ. Uh...yeah. I'm not seeing the connection.
Second of all, Lucas ALLOWED Kersh a great deal of creative freedom in making ESB...Kersh was quite grateful for it, 20 years later, in an interview with SW Insider. The amount, and severity, of disagreements between Kersh and Lucas while ESB was being filmed have been grossly exaggerated.
Third of all, Lucas asked Kersh back to direct ROTJ, and Kersh said no. When I told this to a bedwetter who was babbling about how ESB was great because Kersh, and Kurtz, kept Lucas out of it as much as possible, the bedwetter got around it by saying, "Well, Kersh probably said no because he knew Kurtz was no longer the producer and wouldn't be protecting him from Lucas." Wait, I thought Kurtz was on the set of ROTJ, which proves...I'm not sure what. Oh, never mind. In any case, the reason Kersh gave for not directing ROTJ was because the shoot for ESB had been very stressful, and he felt that directing one SW movie in a lifetime was plenty.
Fourth of all, Lucas went on to allow Marquand a great deal of creative freedom in making ROTJ, as he had Kersh in making ESB. And finally, Lucas's reasons for choosing Marquand were a mix of needing to get a director attached to the project so it could go forward; he wasn't going to helm it because the shoot for ANH nearly killed him, and since SW was not guild, he had a small pool of directors to choose from. He offered it to David Lynch, who turned him down. Steven Spielberg was unable to do it because he was guild. Lucas had met Marquand a year or so before...he wasn't guild, plus Lucas was impressed with his knowledge of SW lore. So he chose Marquand.
I would be very flattered if you made a Kurtz icon with my quote. :-) Your icons are great.
no subject
Date: 2010-06-16 02:38 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-06-16 09:45 pm (UTC)Speaking of Marquand...I know I've said this before, but ever notice how the you-know-who tore him to shreds as a no-telent "lapdog of Luca$" -- but suddenly became passionate defenders of him and his "artistic rights" with regards to the SE version of ROTJ? You'd think that they'd have been happy that some Ewok footage was cut out of the ending and replaced with galactic celebration footage, given how much they bitch about Ewoks, but no...they screamed about Lucas "desecrating" the movie (which was their favorite punching bag before the prequels started coming out) and wailed that, since Marquand is dead, he cannot approve or disapprove of the changes made to "his movie."
Which brings me to another thing I know I've said before...one of the most outlandish conspiracy theories I've seen bedwetters spin around Lucas is that he waited so long to put the OT on DVD because he hoped the elderly Irvin Kershner would die, and thus be unable to do the director's commentary (Marquand, "conveniently," was already dead). That's patently absurd, and I pointed out that if Lucas didn't want Kersh to do the commentary, all he'd have to do is say, "Kersh, you're not doing the commentary." Bedwetter response: "But that would make him look bad. If he just waited until Kersh died, then Kersh would automatically be excluded."
Oh good LORD...there are just no words.
no subject
Date: 2010-06-16 06:54 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-06-16 09:32 pm (UTC)Thanks for saying your piece, too.
no subject
Date: 2010-06-16 10:18 pm (UTC)